ZALIR

Approach

Proof before pitch.

We do not open a relationship with a recommendation. We open it with something we observed on your site and can show you how to reproduce without us. Everything that follows is built on that one habit.

Every finding includes ObservationEvidenceConfidenceCorrected stateVerification method
01Observe

What is publicly verifiable, without access and without asking you for anything.

02Verify

Reproduce it independently. If it will not reproduce, it does not get reported.

03Model

What the corrected state should be, and what evidence would prove it.

04Fix

Implement it, scoped in writing, exclusions stated before work starts.

05Measure

Confirm in a live environment. Configured is not done. Observed working is done.

Step 01

Observe

Before we ask you for anything.

A surprising amount about a measurement setup is visible from the outside. Which containers load. Which analytics properties receive traffic. Whether a tag manager is present with nothing behind it. Whether campaign identifiers survive a redirect. None of that requires access, and none of it requires your time.

We do this first deliberately. It means the first conversation is about something concrete rather than about our credentials, and it means you can evaluate the quality of our attention before you have spent anything.

Step 02

Verify

The step most work skips.

An observation made once is a rumor. We reproduce every finding independently before it is written down, and we record how it was reproduced so you can do it yourself. Where a finding cannot be confirmed from the outside, it is labeled low confidence and the reason is stated.

Why confidence is stated per finding

A report where everything carries the same certainty is a report that is guessing somewhere. Separating what we know from what we infer is the difference between a diagnosis and a sales document.

Step 03

Model

Define correct before changing anything.

We describe the corrected state and, critically, the evidence that would demonstrate it. Agreeing what proof looks like before the work starts removes the most common argument in this industry, which is whether the thing that was delivered was the thing that was bought.

This is also where we tell you if the fix is not worth doing. A measurement gap that affects a channel you are not spending on is a finding, not a project.

Step 04

Fix

Scoped, bounded, written down.

Every engagement states inclusions and exclusions before it begins, caps revisions, and requires a written change order beyond that cap. This protects you as much as it protects us: unbounded scope is how service relationships turn adversarial.

  • You always getThe documentation, the configuration, and enough detail that another firm could take over. We do not build things only we can maintain.
  • You can always leaveNothing we build is locked to us. Access we hold is handed back or revoked when work ends.
  • You may use your own teamIf you would rather have your developer implement our findings, the report is written so they can.

Step 05

Measure

Observed working, or it is not done.

The last step is the one that makes the first four meaningful. We confirm the change in a live environment, with evidence attached, against the definition of done agreed in step three. A dashboard that looks right but does not reconcile with its source is a defect, not a deliverable.

Then the cycle starts again, because measurement decays. Sites change, consent rules change, platforms deprecate things. What was verified in March is an assumption by September.

Discipline

What we will not do.

A firm is defined at least as much by its refusals as by its capabilities. These are ours, and they are not negotiable for a large enough contract.

We refuse

  • Invented return figures. No revenue number attached to a problem we have not measured.
  • Ranking guarantees. Nobody can honor one.
  • Manufactured urgency. No countdowns, no invented scarcity, no expiring discounts.
  • Unverifiable problems. If it will not reproduce, we do not bill for it.

We also decline

  • Work we cannot prove. If there is no way to demonstrate the result, we are the wrong firm.
  • Automation of broken processes. Automating an unreliable process scales the unreliability.
  • Access we do not need. Least privilege, for the shortest useful time.
  • Lock-in by design. Nothing we build should be hard to take elsewhere.

See the method on your own site.

The Tracking Health Check is steps one through three, delivered as a written report. Whether you buy step four from us is a separate decision.